Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

City Dashboard

The 500 Cities project is a collaboration between CDC, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and the CDC Foundation. The purpose of the 500 Cities project is to provide city- and census tract-level small area estimates for chronic disease risk factors, health outcomes, and clinical preventive service use for the largest 500 cities in the United States. These small area estimates allow cities and local health departments to better understand the burden and geographic distribution of health-related variables in their jurisdictions, and help them plan public health interventions.

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Census Place (City): Corona

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona Adults who Binge Drink: Last 30 Days

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Adults who Binge Drink: Last 30 Days

17.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 17.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 17.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (15.7%), Corona has a value of 17.6% which is higher and worse.
Riverside, CA County Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Corona has a value of 17.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Corona

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona Adults with Cancer

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Adults with Cancer

4.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 4.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.6% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 4.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (6.0%), Corona has a value of 4.6% which is lower and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Corona has a value of 4.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Corona Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65

82.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 82.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 82.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.7%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,438 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (81.3%), Corona has a value of 82.2% which is higher and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
(81.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), Corona has a value of 82.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Corona Colon Cancer Screening: Sigmoidoscopy Past 5 Years and FOBT Past 3 Years, Colonoscopy Past 10 Years, or FOBT Past Year

64.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 64.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 62.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 64.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,435 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (64.5%), Corona has a value of 64.2% which is lower and worse.
Riverside, CA County Value
(64.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), Corona has a value of 64.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Corona Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation

60.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 60.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 60.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,435 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (62.2%), Corona has a value of 60.1% which is lower and worse.
Riverside, CA County Value
(62.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), Corona has a value of 60.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Corona Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74

73.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 73.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 73.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (69.4%), Corona has a value of 73.2% which is higher and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
(69.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Corona has a value of 73.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Census Place (City): Corona Pap Test in Past 3 Years: 21-65

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Pap Test in Past 3 Years: 21-65

84.4%
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (79.5%), Corona has a value of 84.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(79.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Corona

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona Adults with Diabetes

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Adults with Diabetes

9.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 9.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 9.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), Corona has a value of 9.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Corona

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

13.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 13.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,327 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 13.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (18.6%), Corona has a value of 13.6% which is lower and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
(18.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Corona has a value of 13.6% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Corona has a value of 13.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona Children with a Disability

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Children with a Disability

2.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (3.9%), Corona has a value of 2.2%.
Riverside, CA County Value
(3.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3.7%), Corona has a value of 2.2%.
CA Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Corona has a value of 2.2%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

3.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (4.6%), Corona has a value of 3.1%.
Riverside, CA County Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (4.6%), Corona has a value of 3.1%.
CA Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (5.3%), Corona has a value of 3.1%.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona Persons with a Disability

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Persons with a Disability

8.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (11.6%), Corona has a value of 8.2%.
Riverside, CA County Value
(11.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Corona has a value of 8.2%.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Corona has a value of 8.2%.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

2.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (3.3%), Corona has a value of 2.0%.
Riverside, CA County Value
(3.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (2.9%), Corona has a value of 2.0%.
CA Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.6%), Corona has a value of 2.0%.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

2.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (2.8%), Corona has a value of 2.2%.
Riverside, CA County Value
(2.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (2.7%), Corona has a value of 2.2%.
CA Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2.6%), Corona has a value of 2.2%.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona Persons with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Persons with a Vision Difficulty

1.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (2.3%), Corona has a value of 1.8%.
Riverside, CA County Value
(2.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (2.1%), Corona has a value of 1.8%.
CA Value
(2.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Corona has a value of 1.8%.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

4.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (6.3%), Corona has a value of 4.3%.
Riverside, CA County Value
(6.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (5.8%), Corona has a value of 4.3%.
CA Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (6.7%), Corona has a value of 4.3%.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona Adults who have had a Routine Checkup

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Adults who have had a Routine Checkup

59.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 59.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 63.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 59.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (62.5%), Corona has a value of 59.8% which is lower and worse.
Riverside, CA County Value
(62.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the US Value (73.6%), Corona has a value of 59.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(73.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Corona Adults without Health Insurance

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Adults without Health Insurance

11.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 11.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 11.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (13.0%), Corona has a value of 11.3% which is lower and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), Corona has a value of 11.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Corona Children with Health Insurance

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Children with Health Insurance

96.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Corona has a value of 96.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 97.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 96.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 42 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Corona has a value of 96.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 96.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 93.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (96.2%), Corona has a value of 96.6% which is higher and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
(96.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (96.8%), Corona has a value of 96.6% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(96.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (94.9%), Corona has a value of 96.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(94.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Corona (96.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (96.5%).
Prior Value
(96.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Corona value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona Persons with Private Health Insurance Only

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Persons with Private Health Insurance Only

60.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (49.3%), Corona has a value of 60.9%.
Riverside, CA County Value
(49.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (53.5%), Corona has a value of 60.9%.
CA Value
(53.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (54.8%), Corona has a value of 60.9%.
US Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Corona (60.9%) is greater  than the previously measured value (56.4%).
Prior Value
(56.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Corona value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona Persons with Public Health Insurance Only

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Persons with Public Health Insurance Only

25.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (33.7%), Corona has a value of 25.9%.
Riverside, CA County Value
(33.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (29.8%), Corona has a value of 25.9%.
CA Value
(29.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8%), Corona has a value of 25.9%.
US Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Corona (25.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.9%).
Prior Value
(25.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Corona value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona Households with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Households with an Internet Subscription

92.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 92.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 92.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,859 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (91.8%), Corona has a value of 92.0% which is higher and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
(91.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (91.6%), Corona has a value of 92.0% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(91.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Corona has a value of 92.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices

Current Value:
97.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 97.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 96.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 92.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,469 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 97.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 93.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.7%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,675 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (96.1%), Corona has a value of 97.3% which is higher and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
(96.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (95.9%), Corona has a value of 97.3% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(95.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (94.0%), Corona has a value of 97.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona Persons with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Persons with an Internet Subscription

93.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 93.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 93.6% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 93.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,859 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (93.6%), Corona has a value of 93.0% which is lower and worse.
Riverside, CA County Value
(93.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (93.4%), Corona has a value of 93.0% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(93.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (91.0%), Corona has a value of 93.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona Adults who Experienced a Stroke

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Adults who Experienced a Stroke

2.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 2.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.6%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 2.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (3.1%), Corona has a value of 2.3% which is lower and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the US Value (3.3%), Corona has a value of 2.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Corona Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease

3.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 3.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.6% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.8%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 3.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.6% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (5.6%), Corona has a value of 3.9% which is lower and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
(5.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the US Value (6.1%), Corona has a value of 3.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Corona Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure

Current Value:
66.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 66.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 68.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 66.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 78.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (72.2%), Corona has a value of 66.2% which is lower and worse.
Riverside, CA County Value
(72.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Corona has a value of 66.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Corona Cholesterol Test History

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Cholesterol Test History

83.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 83.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 85.6% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 81.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 83.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 81.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (84.9%), Corona has a value of 83.9% which is lower and worse.
Riverside, CA County Value
(84.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the US Value (86.4%), Corona has a value of 83.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(86.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Corona High Blood Pressure Prevalence

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona High Blood Pressure Prevalence

24.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 24.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 29.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 24.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (29.3%), Corona has a value of 24.2% which is lower and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
(29.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the US Value (32.7%), Corona has a value of 24.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(32.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (41.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(41.9%)

Census Place (City): Corona High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years

31.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 31.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 31.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (35.6%), Corona has a value of 31.6% which is lower and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
(35.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the US Value (36.4%), Corona has a value of 31.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Corona

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression

17.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 17.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 17.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (16.3%), Corona has a value of 17.0% which is higher and worse.
Riverside, CA County Value
(16.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the US Value (19.5%), Corona has a value of 17.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(19.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Corona Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days

15.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 15.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.8%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 15.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (15.1%), Corona has a value of 15.7% which is higher and worse.
Riverside, CA County Value
(15.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the US Value (14.7%), Corona has a value of 15.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Corona

Health / Mortality Data

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona

Health / Mortality Data

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona Age-Adjusted Death Rate

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Age-Adjusted Death Rate

672.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to Riverside County Census Places, Corona has a value of 672.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 657.1 while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 734.5.
Riverside County Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 13 Riverside County Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (681.48), Corona has a value of 672.0 which is lower and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
(681.48)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.

Census Place (City): Corona

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females

Current Value:
25.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 25.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 30.6% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 26.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,471 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 25.8% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 36.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,400 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (25.4%), Corona has a value of 25.8% which is higher and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
(25.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the US Value (37.9%), Corona has a value of 25.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Corona Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males

Current Value:
44.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 44.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 38.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33.8%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 44.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 42.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 38.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,400 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (44.1%), Corona has a value of 44.9% which is higher and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
(44.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the US Value (43.7%), Corona has a value of 44.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Corona Adults 65+ with a Disability

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Adults 65+ with a Disability

33.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (35.2%), Corona has a value of 33.5%.
Riverside, CA County Value
(35.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (33.5%), Corona has a value of 33.5%.
CA Value
(33.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), Corona has a value of 33.5%.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

10.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (14.0%), Corona has a value of 10.9%.
Riverside, CA County Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (12.9%), Corona has a value of 10.9%.
CA Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Corona has a value of 10.9%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

8.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (8.7%), Corona has a value of 8.8%.
Riverside, CA County Value
(8.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (9.5%), Corona has a value of 8.8%.
CA Value
(9.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (7.4%), Corona has a value of 8.8%.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

6.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (6.4%), Corona has a value of 6.7%.
Riverside, CA County Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (6.1%), Corona has a value of 6.7%.
CA Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Corona has a value of 6.7%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

Current Value:
17.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (15.5%), Corona has a value of 17.2%.
Riverside, CA County Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (16.4%), Corona has a value of 17.2%.
CA Value
(16.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Corona has a value of 17.2%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona

Health / Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona

Health / Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss

11.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,418 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (10.1%), Corona has a value of 11.0% which is higher and worse.
Riverside, CA County Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the US Value (13.4%), Corona has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Corona Adults who Visited a Dentist

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Adults who Visited a Dentist

59.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 59.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 63.6% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.8%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 59.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 62.6% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 55.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,438 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (57.0%), Corona has a value of 59.7% which is higher and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
(57.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the US Value (64.8%), Corona has a value of 59.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Corona

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona Adults with Arthritis

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Adults with Arthritis

18.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 18.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 18.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (21.9%), Corona has a value of 18.0% which is lower and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
(21.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the US Value (25.2%), Corona has a value of 18.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(25.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Corona Adults with Kidney Disease

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Adults with Kidney Disease

2.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 2.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 2.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.7%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (3.2%), Corona has a value of 2.5% which is lower and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
(3.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the US Value (3.1%), Corona has a value of 2.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Corona

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona Adults who are Sedentary

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Adults who are Sedentary

19.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 19.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 19.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), Corona has a value of 19.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Census Place (City): Corona

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona Adults with COPD

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Adults with COPD

4.6%
Percent of adults
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 4.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 4.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (5.8%), Corona has a value of 4.6% which is lower and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the US Value (6.4%), Corona has a value of 4.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Corona Adults with Current Asthma

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Adults with Current Asthma

9.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 9.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 9.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (9.1%), Corona has a value of 9.2% which is higher and worse.
Riverside, CA County Value
(9.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the US Value (9.7%), Corona has a value of 9.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Corona

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona Adults who Smoke

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Adults who Smoke

12.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 12.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 12.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (12.2%), Corona has a value of 12.2%.
Riverside, CA County Value
(12.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the US Value (13.5%), Corona has a value of 12.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Census Place (City): Corona

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona Adults Who Are Obese

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Adults Who Are Obese

34.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 34.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 31.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 34.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.6% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), Corona has a value of 34.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Corona

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona Insufficient Sleep

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Insufficient Sleep

34.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 34.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 34.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 33.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,438 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (35.0%), Corona has a value of 34.7% which is lower and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the US Value (32.7%), Corona has a value of 34.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(32.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (26.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(26.7%)

Census Place (City): Corona Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

10.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 10.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 10.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (11.7%), Corona has a value of 10.2% which is lower and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
(11.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.9%), Corona has a value of 10.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Corona Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair

Current Value:
15.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 15.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.8%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 15.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (18.7%), Corona has a value of 15.9% which is lower and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the US Value (16.1%), Corona has a value of 15.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Corona

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona Average Household Size

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Average Household Size

3.40
Persons per household
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (3.20), Corona has a value of 3.40.
Riverside, CA County Value
(3.20)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (2.90), Corona has a value of 3.40.
CA Value
(2.90)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2.60), Corona has a value of 3.40.
US Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona Foreign Born Persons

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Foreign Born Persons

23.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (21.7%), Corona has a value of 23.8%.
Riverside, CA County Value
(21.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (26.5%), Corona has a value of 23.8%.
CA Value
(26.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Corona has a value of 23.8%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona Veteran Population

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Veteran Population

4.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (6.1%), Corona has a value of 4.3%.
Riverside, CA County Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (4.7%), Corona has a value of 4.3%.
CA Value
(4.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (6.6%), Corona has a value of 4.3%.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona

Community / Social Environment

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona

Community / Social Environment

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona Children in Single-Parent Households

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Children in Single-Parent Households

18.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 18.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.6%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 18.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,568 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (21.8%), Corona has a value of 18.4% which is lower and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
(21.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.4%), Corona has a value of 18.4% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(22.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Corona has a value of 18.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona People 65+ Living Alone

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona People 65+ Living Alone

15.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 15.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.6% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 15.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 37.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,328 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (20.4%), Corona has a value of 15.2% which is lower and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
(20.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.0%), Corona has a value of 15.2% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (26.4%), Corona has a value of 15.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona Mean Travel Time to Work

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Mean Travel Time to Work

35.3
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 35.3 which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.2 while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.7.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,265 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 35.3 which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.9 while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (33.8), Corona has a value of 35.3 which is higher and worse.
Riverside, CA County Value
(33.8)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (29.2), Corona has a value of 35.3 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(29.2)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Corona has a value of 35.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

1.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (0.8%), Corona has a value of 1.0% which is higher and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3.6%), Corona has a value of 1.0% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Corona has a value of 1.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)

Census Place (City): Corona Workers who Drive Alone to Work

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Workers who Drive Alone to Work

78.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 78.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 73.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 79.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,454 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 78.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 85.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,625 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (75.9%), Corona has a value of 78.1% which is higher and worse.
Riverside, CA County Value
(75.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (68.4%), Corona has a value of 78.1% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(68.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (71.7%), Corona has a value of 78.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona Workers who Walk to Work

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Workers who Walk to Work

0.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (1.2%), Corona has a value of 0.7% which is lower and worse.
Riverside, CA County Value
(1.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (2.4%), Corona has a value of 0.7% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Corona has a value of 0.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona

Economy / Employment

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona

Economy / Employment

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

59.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 59.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 54.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 45.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,474 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 59.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 46.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,799 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (54.1%), Corona has a value of 59.1% which is higher and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
(54.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (57.8%), Corona has a value of 59.1% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (58.5%), Corona has a value of 59.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

63.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 63.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 46.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 63.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 57.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 48.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (56.4%), Corona has a value of 63.1% which is higher and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
(56.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (59.3%), Corona has a value of 63.1% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(59.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (59.6%), Corona has a value of 63.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona Size of Labor Force

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Size of Labor Force

89,207
Persons
(November 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Corona (89,207) is greater and better than the previously measured value (88,701).
Prior Value
(88,701)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Corona value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force

4.0%
(November 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Corona has a value of 4.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Corona has a value of 4.0% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on non-seasonally-adjusted data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (4.9%), Corona has a value of 4.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.5%), Corona has a value of 4.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Corona (4.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.0%).
Prior Value
(4.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Corona value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona

Economy / Food Insecurity

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona

Economy / Food Insecurity

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona Households Receiving SNAP with Children

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Households Receiving SNAP with Children

63.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (59.7%), Corona has a value of 63.1%.
Riverside, CA County Value
(59.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (53.1%), Corona has a value of 63.1%.
CA Value
(53.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), Corona has a value of 63.1%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona

Economy / Housing & Homes

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona

Economy / Housing & Homes

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona Homeowner Vacancy Rate

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Homeowner Vacancy Rate

1.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 1.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.0%.
CA Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 1,470 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 1.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 28,912 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (1.4%), Corona has a value of 1.1% which is lower and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (0.9%), Corona has a value of 1.1% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(0.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Corona has a value of 1.1%.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona Homeownership

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Homeownership

60.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 60.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 56.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 42.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 60.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 62.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 49.7%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,990 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (60.3%), Corona has a value of 60.6% which is higher and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
(60.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (51.4%), Corona has a value of 60.6% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (57.8%), Corona has a value of 60.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona Median Household Gross Rent

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Median Household Gross Rent

$2,020
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of $2,020 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than $1,597 while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than $2,072.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,102 locales.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value ($1,711), Corona has a value of $2,020 which is higher and worse.
Riverside, CA County Value
($1,711)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value ($1,856), Corona has a value of $2,020 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
($1,856)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,268), Corona has a value of $2,020 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($1,268)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage

Current Value:
$711
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of $711 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than $656 while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than $833.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,179 locales.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value ($683), Corona has a value of $711 which is higher and worse.
Riverside, CA County Value
($683)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value ($732), Corona has a value of $711 which is lower and better.
CA Value
($732)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($584), Corona has a value of $711 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($584)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs

Current Value:
$2,761
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of $2,761 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than $2,244 while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than $2,800.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,098 locales.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value ($2,384), Corona has a value of $2,761 which is higher and worse.
Riverside, CA County Value
($2,384)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value ($2,759), Corona has a value of $2,761 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
($2,759)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,828), Corona has a value of $2,761 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($1,828)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing

31.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Corona has a value of 31.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 42 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Corona has a value of 31.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (38.4%), Corona has a value of 31.3% which is lower and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
(38.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (37.6%), Corona has a value of 31.3% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(37.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (27.8%), Corona has a value of 31.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(27.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Census Place (City): Corona Overcrowded Households

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Overcrowded Households

7.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 7.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (7.4%), Corona has a value of 7.0% which is lower and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.2%), Corona has a value of 7.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Corona has a value of 7.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Corona Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

Current Value:
59.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 59.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 59.6% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (58.4%), Corona has a value of 59.6% which is higher and worse.
Riverside, CA County Value
(58.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Corona has a value of 59.6% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Corona has a value of 59.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Census Place (City): Corona

Economy / Income

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona

Economy / Income

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona Income Inequality

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Income Inequality

0.416
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 0.416 which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.422 while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.463.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,453 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 0.416 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.404 while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.452.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,505 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (0.448), Corona has a value of 0.416 which is lower and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
(0.448)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (0.490), Corona has a value of 0.416 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(0.490)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (0.483), Corona has a value of 0.416 which is lower and better.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona Median Household Income

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Median Household Income

$103,727
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of $103,727 which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than $81,483 while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than $59,688.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,291 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of $103,727 which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than $61,726 while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than $48,125.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,419 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value ($84,505), Corona has a value of $103,727 which is higher and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
($84,505)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value ($91,905), Corona has a value of $103,727 which is higher and better.
CA Value
($91,905)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($75,149), Corona has a value of $103,727 which is higher and better.
US Value
($75,149)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona Per Capita Income

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Per Capita Income

$38,353
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of $38,353 which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than $37,615 while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than $25,434.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,448 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of $38,353 which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than $31,134 while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than $24,781.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,512 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value ($35,356), Corona has a value of $38,353 which is higher and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
($35,356)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value ($45,591), Corona has a value of $38,353 which is lower and worse.
CA Value
($45,591)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($41,261), Corona has a value of $38,353 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona

Economy / Poverty

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona

Economy / Poverty

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Children Living Below Poverty Level

9.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 9.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 9.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,556 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (14.8%), Corona has a value of 9.8% which is lower and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Corona has a value of 9.8% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Corona has a value of 9.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona Families Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Families Living Below Poverty Level

7.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 7.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,457 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 7.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,635 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (8.6%), Corona has a value of 7.4% which is lower and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
(8.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.5%), Corona has a value of 7.4% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Corona has a value of 7.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

10.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 10.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 10.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (10.3%), Corona has a value of 10.7% which is higher and worse.
Riverside, CA County Value
(10.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Corona has a value of 10.7% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Corona has a value of 10.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona People Living 200% Above Poverty Level

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona People Living 200% Above Poverty Level

77.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 77.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.6% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 57.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,481 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 77.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (70.8%), Corona has a value of 77.2% which is higher and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
(70.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (72.0%), Corona has a value of 77.2% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(72.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (71.2%), Corona has a value of 77.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(71.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona People Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona People Living Below Poverty Level

8.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 8.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,481 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 8.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (11.4%), Corona has a value of 8.5% which is lower and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (12.1%), Corona has a value of 8.5% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(12.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Corona has a value of 8.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

Census Place (City): Corona Youth not in School or Working

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona Youth not in School or Working

1.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 1.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
CA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 1,258 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 1.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (2.2%), Corona has a value of 1.1% which is lower and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (1.5%), Corona has a value of 1.1% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Corona has a value of 1.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona

Education / Educational Attainment

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona

Education / Educational Attainment

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Corona People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Corona People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher

30.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 30.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 12.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 30.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 19.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 11.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (24.1%), Corona has a value of 30.5% which is higher and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
(24.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (35.9%), Corona has a value of 30.5% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(35.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Corona has a value of 30.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Corona People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher

Current Value:
85.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Corona has a value of 85.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Corona has a value of 85.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Riverside, CA County Value (83.1%), Corona has a value of 85.8% which is higher and better.
Riverside, CA County Value
(83.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Riverside County value.
Compared to the CA Value (84.4%), Corona has a value of 85.8% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(84.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Corona has a value of 85.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Corona value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health Data

More Information

Priority Areas

More Information

Resources

More Information

SHAPE Riverside